![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjktv-6dpIRAu4Dgq7wC9-TQI1W9Dq1rar1MApD2IvPsPHXh2NFz7BPl7sgyte0_8VmgLMDj8sTfYmScjBeY7UcqBpLp4RZn7DSHVnj4ZklSwQhPiPIpsirmxf7SiMA56YzlYPNMxxXy3Q/s200/majora_link1.jpg)
I am using the term voyeur in the more child appropriate sense of the word; Link is no sexual deviant after all. He is, however, an agent who easily slips into the lives of others, navigating his way through various cultures. By donning various masks, some allowing Link to change into an entirely different species, Link has the uncanny ability to immerse himself (and by extension the player) into the lives of others.
On his excellent GameSetWatch column Lingua Franca, Daniel Johnson discusses "cultural pedagogy of the Goron tribe in the Legend Of Zelda series." In this piece, Johnson touches upon Link's ability to change into a Goron hero:
"What this mechanic does is allow Link to switch on the fly between ingroup and outgroup membership of the respective cultures, changing his interplay with each. This gives players the opportunity to observe first-hand how it feels to be treated as either one of the races within the game. Termina's residents don't have four sets of speech for the respective races, but rather, the speech is tied to the gameplay and narrative."
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhfSS3HuQVd-UOixU2Jb5RR96GogcYKNLIUA9qdn9y8kPlVX6KsqdQiq6yK3LRzbOAzmmy3L4QnhK_74J8v7jAq3dSub2kaIjrnwXa4w__Qy5lDMlo5J2oBe5SbAeDKjUMF-LfAi8Sa5Us/s320/GoronLullaby.jpg)
To some extent, Link has no real story of his own. The individual stories of the townspeople, even their mundane concerns, eclipse the larger goal of stopping the coming apocalypse. Link's lack of speech (a characteristic I find increasingly strange as the franchise matures) compounds the sense Link is a disembodied agent acting out the will of the player, completely independent from a preexisting "Link."
Being able to interact with NPCs numerous times with different results is incredibly rare. It breathes realism into Majora's Mask that other stagnant games should envy. The player easily becomes intimate with the townspeople, learning of their burdens and helping where he can. But this help isn't necesarily permanent. Link's assistance can be easily brushed away with time reversal. After aging one man's chicks into chickens and raising his spirits,a time reversal will return Link to day one to find the same man morose once again. Link is only temporarily responsible for the immediate fate of Termina's population. It's a voyeuristic social experiment at its best.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiA_34g7JJUISqHsl0V6dqpwx1uOyzfnt1aCQu4oLHfD0EieN83vaZFlXCRivBu-2mJOjyj7hd7l_9i-owIJHxiq9UWwnpDqOd82x6QK5Ax4Xp7mm7I8Eoi8h3tRZDuuimRM7QHwNOagKE/s320/Event12.jpg)
None of this is to say Majora's Mask is immature or pointlessly complicated. On the contrary, I think Link's social interaction is by far the most interesting and innovative aspect of Majora's Mask. Few people are eager to admit voyeuristic tendencies, although the desire to gossip, interact with strangers, and play the role of insider is very human. Videogames are partly interesting because we can become someone else for awhile, with their own relationships and history. Majora's Mask feeds this desire by creating Link as not one character, but an amalgamation of many.
As someone who has played nearly every Zelda but whose very favorite of the series is Majora's Mask, I'm totally in agreement with what you say about the best and worst parts of this game. As a Zelda veteran, though, the temporary aspect of everything Link did had an extra layer of meaning for me.
ReplyDeleteZeldas games ever since the Super Nintendo follow this formula:
1. Link goes to a dungeon and defeats the evil monsters inside.
2. This results in someone being helped in the world outside the dungeon.
3. They then reward Link with something he needs to access to the next dungeon. Rinse, wash, repeat.
The interesting thing Majora's Mask did was to keep this formula intact, but wave in the player's face the unimportance of step 2. For example, Link goes through a lot of trouble to destroy the evil spirit inhabiting the Goron temple and unfreeze their village, for which they're suitably grateful and give him the special bomb he needs to access to the next area.
Except... whoops, saved the Gorons, but forgot to do anything about the incoming moon-collision apocalypse. Link has no choice but to go back in time, putting the Gorons right back to square 1. Link still has the special bomb (and all the other tools he's collected in a similar manner) and can continue on; the Gorons, however, are just as screwed over as if Link had done nothing.
Maybe I'm reading beyond what's actually there, but it seems like Nintendo went meta here. From one perspective, Zelda is only superficially a game about travelling from place to place and saving people from evil monsters. What's really important is that the people always have useful things to give Link after being rescued.
@ David
ReplyDeleteI hadn't actually thought about the sad aspects of Link's time travel. Maybe it would have been nice too see Link morose over the fact he can't help anyone permanently, at least until he stops the moon-ocalypse. Definitely meta if you ask me. But with a silent protagonist, maybe it didn't resonate as much with me. Of course I'm a just a Zelda rookie.
I'm starting to develop a theory about Majora's Mask:
ReplyDeleteFolks like David (and me) love Majora's Mask because it is such a departure from the Zelda we're accustomed to.
For folks like Jorge, the break in game structure tradition doesn't hold the same weight, as it hasn't been internalized by playing the previous games to death.
the zelda series are the best games ever, majoras mask was amazing i want to find and sell those masks
ReplyDelete